Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Michael Jordan v. Gene Johnson
as 11-6115
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL TYRONE JORDAN
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Department of Corrections
Charmeen Gray v. Gene Johnson
as 10-7383
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARMEEN JABAR GRAY
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections
Kenneth Barbour v. Gene Johnson
as 10-7280
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director for Virginia Department of Corrections, BRYAN WATSON, Warden and MCBRIBE, Investigator at WRSP
DeVinche Albritton v. Gene Johnson
as 10-6912
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEVINCHE ALBRITTON
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections, JOHN DOE, Virginia Department of Corrections Health Services Director, DAVID B. EVERETT, Warden of Sussex II State Prison and others
Warren Banks v. Gene Johnson
as 10-6734
Petitioner - Appellant:
WARREN BANKS
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Department of Corrections
Derek Hurley v. Gene Johnson
as 10-6471
Petitioner - Appellant:
DEREK DWAYNE HURLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections
Derek Tice v. Gene Johnson
as 09-8245
Petitioner - Appellee:
DEREK ELLIOTT TICE
Respondent - Appellant:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections
Barba Faltz v. Gene Johnson
as 09-7961
Petitioner - Appellant:
BARBA O'NEAL FALTZ
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections
Kevin Neal v. Gene Johnson
as 09-7532
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEVIN L. NEAL
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections
Ricky Nelson v. Gene Johnson
as 09-7024
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICKY DONNELL NELSON
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
