Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Jeffrey Chijioke-Uche v. Chapman Chevrolet LLC, et al
as 24-1691
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY SOLOMON CHIJIOKE-UCHE
Defendant:
CHAPMAN CHEVROLET LLC and GENERAL MOTORS LLC
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. et al v. ACTAVIS HOLDCO U.S., INC. et al
as 2:2024cv01430
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., ARAMARK SERVICES, INC., GENERAL MOTORS LLC and others
Defendant:
ACTAVIS HOLDCO U.S., INC., ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC, ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
MERTZ v. GENERAL MOTORS LLC
as 5:2023cv02169
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN JAMES MERTZ
Defendant:
GENERAL MOTORS LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
PICCONE v. GENERAL MOTORS LLC
as 1:2022cv00877
Plaintiff:
NICK PICCONE d/b/a NJP MECHANICAL HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING LLC and NICK PICCONE doing business as NJP Mechanical Heating & Air Conditioning LLC
Defendant:
GENERAL MOTORS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
VESPICO v. GENERAL MOTORS LLC
as 5:2022cv00379
Plaintiff:
JOHN VESPICO
Defendant:
GENERAL MOTORS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Auto Negligence
Mall Chevrolet Inc v. General Motors LLC
as 21-2283
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MALL CHEVROLET INC
Defendant / Appellee:
GENERAL MOTORS LLC
Roland Anderson v. General Motors LLC
as 20-3223
Defendant / Appellee:
GENERAL MOTORS LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROLAND C. ANDERSON
Talley v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2020cv01137
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Plaintiff:
Chris Talley
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
KARU v. TAKATA CORPORATION et al
as 2:2016cv04558
Defendant:
TAKATA CORPORATION, GENERAL MOTORS LLC and TK HOLDINGS, INC.
Plaintiff:
MARLENE S. KARU
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
General Motors LLC v. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha et al
as 2:2015cv04739
Plaintiff:
GENERAL MOTORS LLC
Defendant:
NIPPON YUSEN KABUSHIKI KAISHA, NYK LINE (NORTH AMERICA INC.), WALLENIUS WILHELMSEN LOGISTICS AS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
