Cases 51 - 60 of 464
Thompson v. General Motors, LLC
as 2:2023cv12249
Plaintiff:
Larry Eugene Thompson, Jr.
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
VAN GILS v. General Motors LLC
as 2:2023cv12114
Plaintiff:
ANDREW VAN GILS
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Andrei Fenner, et al v. General Motors, LLC, et al
as 23-1698
Plaintiff:
ANDREI FENNER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PANTEL PLAINTIFFS
Defendant / Appellee:
GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, ROBERT BOSCH GMBH and ROBERT BOSCH LLC
Andrei Fenner, et al v. General Motors, LLC, et al
as 23-1696
Plaintiff:
ANDREI FENNER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDERTON PLAINTIFFS
Defendant / Appellee:
GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, ROBERT BOSCH GMBH and ROBERT BOSCH LLC
Andrei Fenner, et al v. General Motors, LLC, et al
as 23-1697
Plaintiff:
ANDREI FENNER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BULAON PLAINTIFFS
Defendant / Appellee:
GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, ROBERT BOSCH GMBH and ROBERT BOSCH LLC
Ciaramitaro v. General Motors LLC
as 5:2023cv11805
Plaintiff:
Kristina Ciaramitaro
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Andrei Fenner, et al v. General Motors, LLC, et al
as 23-1648
Plaintiff:
ANDREI FENNER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILLIP BURNS, JAMES T. CRUNKLETON, III, ANTHONY GADECKI and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, ROBERT BOSCH GMBH and ROBERT BOSCH LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv11644
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
In re: General Motors, LLC
as 23-106
Petitioner:
In re: GENERAL MOTORS, LLC
Respondent:
MARK D. CHAPMAN, WILLIAM MCDUFFIE, CLAY KINCHELOE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
