Cases 31 - 40 of 69
Darby v. Witty et al
as 2:2018cv00007
Plaintiff:
Charles H. Darby, III
Defendant:
Karey L. Witty, Ralf Sulke, John Deghetto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VANAMAN v. ROBINSON et al
as 2:2018cv01003
Plaintiff:
CHARLES VANAMAN
Defendant:
GEORGE ROBINSON, GANJI, VALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. ROBINSON et al
as 2:2018cv00686
Petitioner:
VERNON JOHNSON
Respondent:
GEORGE ROBINSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HAYES v. SGT. WILKENS et al
as 2:2017cv13182
Plaintiff:
RAHEEM MAURICE HAYES
Defendant:
SGT. WILKENS, GEORGE ROBINSON and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MULERO v. ROBINSON et al
as 2:2017cv11913
Petitioner:
JULIO MULERO
Respondent:
GEORGE ROBINSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ST. CLAIRE v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al.
as 2:2017cv11848
Plaintiff:
SHARIF ST. CLAIRE
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GARY M. LANIGAN, STEVEN JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYD v. JOHN DOE et al
as 2:2017cv06098
Plaintiff:
LAMONT BOYD
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, GARY M. LANIGAN, GEORGE ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KOSCH v. ROBINSON et al
as 2:2017cv05760
Respondent:
GEORGE ROBINSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Petitioner:
ROBERT KOSCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MINOR v. JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv03741
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS MINOR
Defendant:
STEVEN JOHNSON, TIMOTHY MAINES, CYNTHIA JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL v. ROBINSON et al
as 2:2017cv05491
Petitioner:
SPILLERMAN HILL
Respondent:
GEORGE ROBINSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
