Cases 1 - 10 of 11
YOUNG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv08706
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GEORGE YOUNG
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
YOUNG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv42142
Plaintiff:
DONALD GEORGE YOUNG
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YOUNG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv84347
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GEORGE YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young v. Warden, FCI Miami
as 1:2017cv22661
Respondent:
Warden FCI Miami
Plaintiff:
Donald George Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Young v. Warden, FCI Miami
as 5:2017cv00294
Petitioner:
Donald George Young
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Miami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Michael Young, Jr. v. Mike Scott, et al
as 16-15762
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL GEORGE YOUNG, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MIKE SCOTT, Sheriff, FNU ELLENGOOD, Chief, THOMAS EBERHARDT and others
Young et al v. Scott et al
as 2:2016cv00581
Plaintiff:
Michael George Young, Jr., Steven Tompkins, Rodney Dickerson and others
Defendant:
Mike Scott, FNU Ellengood, Thomas Eberhardt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Scott et al
as 2:2016cv00044
Plaintiff:
Michael George Young, Jr.
Defendant:
Mike Scott, Thomas Eberhart, James Baracco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. O' Carrol et al
as 3:2012cv00740
Plaintiff:
Ronald Carter
Defendant:
Patrick P. O' Carrol, Jr., The Social Security Administration (SSA), Twelve unknown Social Security dministration Cooperative Disability Investigator (CDI) Agents and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carter v. Young
as 3:2011cv01085
Plaintiff:
Ronald Carter
Defendant:
George Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
