Cases 1 - 10 of 570
Bell v. Georgia-Pacific Wood Products LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01474
Defendant:
Jack Doe, US Metal Works Inc, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv04017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv00678
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv00347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Philyaw et al v. Honeywell International Inc
as 8:2016cv03160
Plaintiff:
Philyaw, Varon V Philyaw and Joyce Bowen Philyaw
Defendant:
3M Company, CBS Corporation, Georgia-Pacific LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rochester v. Georgia pacific Paper Corp et al
as 6:2015cv02220
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
Georgia pacific Paper Corp, Marlboro Regl Trumer Hosp, Paper-Mate Pen Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv04178
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
McMillan v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 9:2013cv02607
Plaintiff:
John Newton McMillan
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Georgia-Pacific Corporation Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Andrews v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2013cv02055
Plaintiff:
James R Andrews and Grace B Andrews
Defendant:
3M Company, A W Chesterton Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Dobbins v. Georgia Pacific Wood Products LLC et al
as 8:2013cv00524
Plaintiff:
John L Dobbins
Defendant:
Georgia Pacific Wood Products LLC and Dan Bowden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
