Cases 1 - 10 of 106
Sundby, et al. v. Marquee Funding Group, Inc., et al.
as 24-1027
Plaintiff:
DALE SUNDBY and EDITH SUNDBY
Defendant:
MARQUEE FUNDING GROUP, INC., PLATINUM LOAN SERVICING, INC., JEFFREY MYERS and others
Sundby v. Myers, et al.
as 24-865
Plaintiff:
DALE SUNDBY
Defendant:
JEFFREY MYERS, KATHLEEN MYERS, ANDRES SALSIDO, Trustee and others
Other:
EDITH SUNDBY, Proposed Intervenor-Plaintiff
Dale Sundby v. USDC-CASD
as 23-70169
Not Classified By Court:
In re: DALE SUNDBY, JEFFREY MYERS, KATHLEEN MYERS and others
Petitioner:
DALE SUNDBY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
Babette Beriones v. IMH Asset Corp., et al
as 23-55698
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BABETTE T. BERIONES
Defendant / Appellee:
IMH ASSET CORP., Indenture Trustee, DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, Owner Trustee, IMPAC FUNDING CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-55659
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dale Sundby, et al v. USDC-CASD
as 23-70128
Not Classified By Court:
In re: DALE SUNDBY, DALE SUNDBY, Trustee, MARQUEE FUNDING GROUP, INC. and others
Petitioner:
DALE SUNDBY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
Jaspal Gill v. Donald Holbrook
as 23-35363
Petitioner / Appellant:
JASPAL SINGH GILL
Respondent / Appellee:
DONALD HOLBROOK, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary
Singh-Gill v. Garland
as 23-763
Petitioner:
HARBANS SINGH-GILL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gill v. Garland
as 22-783
Petitioner:
PIARA SINGH GILL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Delbert Greene v. State of Nevada, et al
as 22-15635
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DELBERT MARSHALL GREENE
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
