Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10689
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Saginaw County Republican Committee v. Roy et al
as 1:2023cv13228
Plaintiff:
Saginaw County Republican Committee and Saginaw County Republican Party
Defendant:
Thomas Roy, Janet Stoney and R. Scott Gilmore
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv13083
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12651
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Gilmore et al
as 2:2022cv12775
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Michelle Gilmore, Gregory Mace, Phoebe Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Fedorova v. Foley et al
as 1:2022cv00991
Defendant:
Covius Document Services, LLC, Nationwide Title Clearing, LLC, William P. Foley, II and others
Plaintiff:
Elena Fedorova
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Price v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv10662
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L. Price
Defendant:
United States of America, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Gilmore v. City of Romulus et al
as 2:2021cv12853
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Gilmore
Defendant:
City of Romulus, Goff Rice, Cameron Timm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Gilmore v. Jack Taeff
as 2:2021cv12628
Plaintiff:
Anthony Gilmore
Defendant:
Jack Taeff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilmore et al v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. & Co et al
as 2:2021cv11553
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. & Co
Plaintiff:
Ravynne Gilmore and Lucinda Council
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
