Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Harding v. Benzel et al
as 2:2022cv01002
Plaintiff:
Demetrius C Harding
Defendant:
Warden J Benzel, Sergeant Johnston, CO Gilmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilmore v. Milwaukee County Jail Facility
as 2:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
Ty'Shawn Kaviontae Gilmore and Ackbar K Gilmore
Defendant:
Milwaukee County Jail Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilmore, Corey v. Carr, Kevin et al
as 3:2020cv00311
Defendant:
Chris Buesgen, Randy Scott, Mario Canziani and others
Plaintiff:
Corey Gilmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00769
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US Venture Inc v. Petro Tech et al
as 1:2018cv00476
Plaintiff:
US Venture Inc
Defendant:
Steven Brad Gilmore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lovelace v. Menne et al
as 1:2013cv00933
Plaintiff:
Roman D Lovelace
Defendant:
Rodney G Menne , Davis R Arndt, Matthew M Babiash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ultratec, Inc. et al v. Sorenson Communications, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00346
Plaintiff:
Ultratec, Inc. and CapTel, Inc.
Defendant:
Sorenson Communications, Inc. and CaptionCall, LLC
Intervenor:
Maschoff Brennan Laycock Gilmore Israelsen & Wright, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Gilmore et al v. E I Du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2012cv00592
Defendant:
E I du Pont de Nemours and Company
Plaintiff:
Carl Gilmore and Desa Gilmore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gilmore v. Pollard
as 2:2008cv00413
Petitioner:
Cory Gilmore
Respondent:
William Pollard
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gilmore v. Smith et al
as 2:2007cv01098
Plaintiff:
Rex Gilmore
Defendant:
Joe Smith and David A Clarke, Jr
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
