Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv01159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv20561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
GMRI, Inc. v. Independence Bank of Georgia
as 1:2014cv02999
Plaintiff:
GMRI, Inc.
Defendant:
Independence Bank of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2014cv00354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Soldiers and Sailors Employment and Reemployment Act
Patterson et al v. Darden Concepts, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00659
Plaintiff:
Ashley Bell Patterson and Alexander Jordan
Defendant:
Darden Concepts, Inc. and GMRI, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Louangel, Inc. et al v. Darden Restaurants, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01039
Plaintiff:
Louangel, Inc. , The Longhorn Boys Corporation and Angelo Papakostas
Defendant:
Darden Restaurants, Inc. , Darden Concepts, Inc. , Rare Hospitality Management, Inc. and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
Alston & Bird LLP
Louangel, Inc. et al v. Darden Restaurants, Inc. et al
as 1:2013mi00037
Plaintiff:
Louangel, Inc. , The Longhorn Boys Corporation and Angelo Papakostas
Defendant:
Darden Restaurants, Inc. , Darden Concepts, Inc. , Rare Hospitality Management, Inc. and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
Alston & Bird LLP
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv61742
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv01955
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
