Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Cook v. GNC Holdings
as 4:2026cv00181
Plaintiff:
Matthew W. Cook
Defendant:
GNC Holdings and Hull Property Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Hopson et al v. Prevagen, Inc. et al
as 5:2026cv03594
Plaintiff:
Juanita Hopson and Stevenson Hopson
Defendant:
Prevagen, Inc., Amazon.com Sales, Inc. and GNC Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GNC HOLDINGS, LLC v. KLOUT PWR, LLC et al
as 2:2026cv01294
Plaintiff:
GNC HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
KLOUT PWR, LLC, GARY MARSHALL and DANIEL WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
GNC HOLDINGS, LLC v. CEZAR et al
as 2:2026cv00805
Plaintiff:
GNC HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
RAFAEL CEZAR and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Manuel Q. Juarez v. GNC Holdings, LLC
as 2:2026cv03359
Plaintiff:
Manuel Q. Juarez
Defendant:
GNC HOLDINGS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Patent Armory Inc. v. GNC Holdings, LLC
as 1:2026cv00299
Plaintiff:
Patent Armory Inc.
Defendant:
GNC Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Anthony Malko v. GNC Holdings, LLC
as 2:2026cv01833
Plaintiff:
Anthony Malko
Defendant:
GNC Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2510 Wire Interception
GNC HOLDINGS, LLC v. NIRVANA WATER SCIENCES CORP.
as 2:2026cv00268
Plaintiff:
GNC HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
NIRVANA WATER SCIENCES CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
GNC HOLDINGS, LLC v. Arjolo, Inc. et al
as 2:2026cv00192
Plaintiff:
GNC HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
Arjolo, Inc. and Echelon USA, Inc.
Counter-Claimant:
Arjolo, Inc.
Counter-Defendant:
GNC HOLDINGS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
GNC HOLDINGS, LLC v. STENSUL, INC.
as 2:2026cv00137
Plaintiff:
GNC HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
STENSUL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.