Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Godwin v. Mashood et al
as 1:2020cv00969
Defendant:
Natalie Goldburg, Lookman Mashood and Buka New York Corp.
Plaintiff:
Ochienzes Godwin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Deuel et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12272
Plaintiff:
Tara Haskell, Joseph P. Deuel, Gideon Huttler and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Aamoth et al v. The Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2018cv12276
Plaintiff:
John Doe 17, Rodrigo Gomez Castillo, Joseph P. Deuel and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Atiles et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11854
Plaintiff:
Joseph Poidomani, Michael Lamorte, Paul Nietman and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv10501
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Basile et al v. Smartax Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv03993
Defendant:
Yves St. Surin and Smartax Service, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Alana Charles and Godwin Basile
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Godwin v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2018cv05703
Plaintiff:
James Godwin
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Godwin v. The State of New York (DOCCS) et al
as 9:2018cv00245
Defendant:
Claude Roland, The State of New York (DOCCS), Adirondack Medical Center and others
Plaintiff:
James Godwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pizarro v. Ponte et al
as 1:2017cv06506
Plaintiff:
Jose Pizarro, Edwin Hernandez, Antonio Chavarria and others
Defendant:
Joseph Ponte, John/Jane Doe, Monica Windley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bohning et al v. The City and State of New York
as 1:2017cv06441
Plaintiff:
Peter Bohning, Jose Pizarro, Juel Roundtree and others
Defendant:
The City and State of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
