Cases 31 - 40 of 43
United States of America v. Gjuraj (Simms)
as 11-5224
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Isni Gjuraj, Arbnor Gjini, Cookie, Richard Davis, AKA Poo Poo, AKA Shooter, AKA Buck and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Travis Simms, AKA Trav Lo, AKA Love
United States of America v. Gjuraj (Simms)
as 11-3115
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Isni Gjuraj, Arbnor Gjini, Cookie, Richard Davis, AKA Poo Poo, AKA Shooter, AKA Buck and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Travis Simms, AKA Trav Lo, AKA Love
Agbomah v. Holder
as 11-2159
Petitioner:
Godwin Ike Amulosi Agbomah
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01844
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
United States of America v. Okpomo
as 10-3981
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Godwin Okpomo
Ugwu v. Holder et al
as 1:2010cv06705
Petitioner:
Godwin Ugwu
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Janet Napolitano, Felicia Skinner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
United States of America v. Meadow
as 10-1089
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Godwin Olutosin Meadows
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Godwin v. Transoceanic Cable Ship Company Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02827
Plaintiff:
Solomon Godwin
Defendant:
Transoceanic Cable Ship Company Inc., Tyco Telecommunications (US) Inc. and C.S. Global Sentinel, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Godwin v. New York City Police Department et al
as 1:2009cv01928
Plaintiff:
Edward Godwin
Defendant:
New York City Police Department, Rocco Ruscdtto, Bronx Lebanon Hospital Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
