Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Mena-Gomez et al v. Thomas et al
as 2:2019cv02537
Defendant:
Josh Odom, Global Merchandising, Inc. and Larry D Thomas
Plaintiff:
Marisela Mena-Gomez and Francisco Mena-Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brinkman (ID 65738) v. Haberer et al
as 5:2018cv03246
Defendant:
Corizon Company, Connie R. Delperdang, Deane Donley and others
Plaintiff:
Albert L. Brinkman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brinkman (ID 65738) v. Norwood et al
as 5:2018cv03136
Plaintiff:
Albert L. Brinkman
Defendant:
Joe Norwood, Kansas Department of Corrections, Douglas Burris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kramer v. Rice County Sheriff Office/Jail et al
as 6:2017cv01179
Plaintiff:
Nicholas C. Kramer
Defendant:
Rice County Sheriff Office/Jail , Kathi Gomez , Rita Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gomez v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv02302
Plaintiff:
John M. Gomez
Defendant:
United States of America and Mark E. Wisner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Gomez et al v. Wisner et al
as 2:2017cv02263
Plaintiff:
Sean Gomez and Jolisa Gomez
Defendant:
Mark E. Wisner and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Lynn (ID 64377) v. McCurrie et al
as 5:2017cv03041
Plaintiff:
Patrick C. Lynn
Defendant:
Anthony McCurrie, (fnu) Fortier, Derek Sweigart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kobel v. Douglas County Jail et al
as 5:2014cv03085
Plaintiff:
Scott Harris Kobel
Defendant:
Douglas County Jail, (fnu) Bunting, (fnu) Hagenbuch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomez-Alvarez v. USA
as 2:2013cv02067
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ovex Gomez-Alvarez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hernandez v. Cooper Tire and Rubber Co. et al
as 6:2012cv01399
Plaintiff:
Lorena Hernandez
Defendant:
Cooper Tire and Rubber Co. , Mary Belle Hernandez and Heriberto Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
