Cases 1 - 10 of 612
(PC) Good v. Shasta County Sheriff Dept
as 2:2024cv01501
Plaintiff:
Joshua R. Good
Defendant:
Shasta County Sheriff Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Good v. Pearson et al
as 2:2024cv01503
Plaintiff:
Joshua R. Good
Defendant:
Patty Pearson, Michael Richlin, Alicia Richlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Venture Goods LLC v. Venture Apparel, Inc
as 5:2024cv02143
Plaintiff:
Venture Goods LLC. doing business as Venture Quality Goods
Defendant:
Venture Apparel, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Samuel D. Good v. Department of Justice Superior Courts et al
as 2:2024cv02713
Plaintiff:
Samuel D. Good, Jr. and Samuel Dennis Good
Defendant:
Department of Justice Superior Courts, Moulten, Elizabeth Boyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03939
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03938
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Good v. FCA US, LLC
as 3:2024cv00641
Plaintiff:
Derek Good
Defendant:
FCA US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 231
Samuel Good Jr v. People of State of California
as 2:2024cv02649
Petitioner:
Samuel Good, Jr.
Respondent:
People of State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
