Cases 1 - 10 of 24
SWEENEY v. GOOGLE, INC. et al
as 3:2023cv20978
Plaintiff:
Conor Sweeney
Defendant:
GOOGLE, INC., ALPHABET INC, GOOGLE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv12489
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ABULKHAIR v. GOOGLE INC. et al
as 2:2017cv07217
Plaintiff:
ASSEM A. ABULKHAIR
Defendant:
GOOGLE INC., LAWRENCE EDWARD PAGE and SERGEY MIKHAYLOVICH BRIM
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
GOOGLE, INC. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2017cv05847
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellant:
GOOGLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
THE CENTER FOR ORTHOPEDICS AND SPORTS MEDICINE et al v. ANTHEM BLUE CROSS LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 3:2016cv08876
Plaintiff:
THE CENTER FOR ORTHOPEDICS AND SPORTS MEDICINE , DANIEL E. FOX, M.D. and ADRIAN PANORAN
Defendant:
ANTHEM BLUE CROSS LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY and GOOGLE, INC.,
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
WEERAHANDI v. SHELESH et al
as 3:2016cv06131
Plaintiff:
NUWAN WEERAHANDI
Defendant:
ALIA SHELESH, EVAN JOHN YOUNG, FULLSCREEN, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LAMPON-PAZ v. GOOGLE INC.
as 2:2015cv05594
Plaintiff:
MANUEL LAMPON-PAZ
Defendant:
GOOGLE INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SPY PHONE LABS LLC. v. GOOGLE INC. et al
as 2:2014cv06565
Plaintiff:
SPY PHONE LABS LLC.
Defendant:
GOOGLE INC. and JOHN DOES 1-50
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
GARDIN v. GOOGLE, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv03307
Plaintiff:
ELVIS GARDIN
Defendant:
GOOGLE, INC., MICHELLE HOCKING, JENNY BYRN GUINAN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
ZAHL, M.D. v. FENNES et al
as 2:2013cv06000
Plaintiff:
KENNETH ZAHL, M.D.
Defendant:
SHERA FENNES, GOOGLE, INC. and JOHN AND JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
