Cases 1 - 10 of 463
Haocheng v. YouTube Inc.
as 24-1116
Plaintiff:
HAOCHENG QIAN
Defendant:
YOUTUBE INC. and GOOGLE INC.
David Sifuentes, III v. Google, Inc.
as 24-1102
Plaintiff:
DAVID ANGEL SIFUENTES, III
Defendant:
GOOGLE, INC.
Raj PatelIn re: Raj Patel
as 24-1010
Petitioner:
In re: RAJ K. PATEL
Respondent:
ALPHABET INC, GOOGLE INC and MARYELLEN NOREIKA
Wescott v. Google, Inc.
as 5:2023cv06178
Plaintiff:
Carl A. Wescott
Defendant:
Google, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Sifuentes v. Google Inc.
as 23-3839
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID A. SIFUENTES, III
Defendant / Appellee:
GOOGLE INC.
Duraisamy v. Sairam Babu et al
as 3:2023cv04620
Defendant:
Thiruvenkatasamy, Senthilrajan, Pradeep Puli Rukmangatha Sairam Babu and others
Plaintiff:
Nagarajan Duraisamy
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Anthony Weimer v. Microsoft Corporation, et al
as 22-35246
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY CRAIG WEIMER and ANTHONY C. WEIMER
Defendant / Appellee:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation, GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware limited liability company and GOOGLE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
In Re: Google Inc. Cookie Placement Consumer Privacy Litigation
as 1:2012md02358
In Re:
Google Inc. Cookie Placement Consumer Privacy Litigation
Defendant:
Google LLC
Petitioner:
Prescott Lovern
Not Classified By Court:
Clerk Jeffery N. Luthi, Matthew Soble, Lourdes Villegas and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Taamneh et al v. Twitter, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv04107
Defendant:
Facebook, Inc., Google, Inc., Twitter, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Taamneh, Dimana Taamneh, Mehier Taamneh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Inform Inc. v. Google LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01530
Plaintiff:
Inform Inc.
Defendant:
Google LLC, Google Inc,, Alphabet Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
