Cases 21 - 30 of 89
Hager et al v. Beshear et al
as 3:2022cv00139
Plaintiff:
Michael Hager, Angela Merideth, Patricia Merideth and others
Defendant:
Governor Andrew Graham Beshear, Eric C. Friedlander, U of L Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Graham v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
David Graham
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Graham v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05222
Plaintiff:
Kelley Graham
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Graham v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv04875
Plaintiff:
Anthony Graham
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Graham v. Wal-Mart, Inc. et al (TV2)
as 2:2021cv00127
Plaintiff:
Karen Graham
Defendant:
Wal-Mart, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Graham v. Wal-Mart, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00126
Plaintiff:
Karen Graham
Defendant:
Wal-Mart, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Graham v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2021cv04116
Plaintiff:
Jack Graham
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and CR Bard Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Graham et al v. Respironics, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00485
Plaintiff:
Gayla Graham and Robert Graham
Defendant:
Respironics, Inc., Philips RS North America, LLC, Gould's Discount Medical, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Graham v. RECO Equipment, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00450
Defendant:
RECO Equipment, Inc. and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Samuel Chad Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Graham v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03147
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kristina Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
