Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Hicks v. Caskey et al
as 4:2010cv00176
Plaintiff:
Aubrey "DOC" Hicks
Defendant:
Dale Caskey, Bartholomew Grimes, Robert Grubb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ollie Evans v. GEO, et al
as 10-60344
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLLIE LEE EVANS
Defendant - Appellee:
GEO, EAST MISSISSIPPI CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, D CASKEY, Warden and others
Nash v. Epps et al
as 2:2010cv00044
Plaintiff:
David Nash
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Ronald King, C. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Epps et al
as 3:2010cv00089
Plaintiff:
Meko Davis
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Ronald King, C. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul Morgan v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 09-60959
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL GRAHAME MORGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, CHRISTOPHER EPPS and others
James Winding v. Bart Grimes, et al
as 09-60943
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES C. WINDING
Defendant - Appellee:
BART GRIMES, Individually and in his official capacity, CARMELITA NAYLOR, DERECK SMITH and others
Winding v. Thomas et al
as 4:2009cv00178
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
Clara Thomas, Ashley Nelson, S. Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Epps et al
as 4:2009cv00106
Plaintiff:
LaTerrance Cole
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Dale Caskey, Bart Grimes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Williams et al
as 4:2009cv00058
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
Ron Williams, E. L. Sparkman, Haley Barbour and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopson v. Epps et al
as 4:2009cv00016
Plaintiff:
Mark Anythony Hopson
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Dale Casket and Gloria Graham
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
