Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Ward #261123 v. Harris et al
as 2:2018cv00694
Plaintiff:
Michael R Ward
Defendant:
Nathaniel Harris, Stephen Graham and Charles L Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Maricopa County Attorney et al
as 2:2017cv03624
Plaintiff:
Kyle Anthony Graham
Defendant:
Maricopa County Attorney and Avondale Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doemer #192804 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv02174
Plaintiff:
Russell Gordon Doemer
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Gerald Thompson, Maureen Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walton #37353 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv00683
Plaintiff:
Geary W Walton
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Alpin Patel, Stephen J Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez et al v. Ryan et al
as 2:2016cv03699
Plaintiff:
Fabian Hernandez , Joseph Artiaga , David J Daniels and others
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Amos Smith, Robert Winfrey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Scarlet v. Ryan et al
as 2:2016cv03273
Plaintiff:
Katrina Luv Scarlet
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Unknown Party, Unknown Kauffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ohman #189498 v. Corizon Health Services et al
as 2:2016cv03292
Plaintiff:
Phillip Ohman
Defendant:
Corizon Health Services, Maureen Johnson, Unknown Lawson and others
Movant:
William Sanders and Edward Lee Tongen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Graham et al
as 2:2016cv02074
Plaintiff:
Amar Abdula Wright
Defendant:
James Graham, Ramon Giron and Hyunjin Yu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scarlet #154202 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2016cv01372
Plaintiff:
Katrina Luv Scarlet
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Unknown Parties, Unknown Areola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirby # 178508 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2016cv01053
Plaintiff:
Christopher Kirby
Defendant:
Unknown Kaizer , Matthew Musson , Stephen Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
