Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Hollinger et al v. Menges et al
as 1:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Terry-Lee: Hollinger and Michelle-Lynn: Hollinger
Defendant:
Judge Matthew D. Menges, Allison Blew, Sheriff Richard P. Keuleber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01895
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rodriguez v. Agent Cain et al
as 3:2023cv01460
Plaintiff:
James Rodriguez, Jr.
Defendant:
Agent Cain, Agent Graham, Agent McDermott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Graham v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2021cv00123
Defendant:
Michael Zaken and JOHN WETZEL
Plaintiff:
Zachary Ryan Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham et al v. Highland Neighborhood Association, Inc.
as 1:2020cv01074
Defendant:
Highland Neighborhood Association, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Wendy Graham and Eric Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Platt v. Graham et al
as 1:2019cv01829
Defendant:
James Graham, R. Clem Malot, David Bolton and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Platt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Graham v. Paris Uniform Rental and Supply et al
as 4:2017cv01832
Plaintiff:
Robert Graham
Defendant:
Paris Uniform Rental and Supply and Paris Healthcare Linen Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Graham-Smith et al v. City of Wilkes-Barre et al
as 3:2017cv00239
Plaintiff:
Delilah A. Graham-Smith and Rodney G. Smith
Defendant:
City of Wilkes-Barre , Matthew Smith , Police Officers John Doe 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
