Cases 1 - 10 of 24
AS et al v. South Carolina Department of Social Services et al
as 2:2023cv05621
Plaintiff:
AS and CJ
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Social Services, Tasha Barkley, Lakisha M Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hutson v. Harper et al
as 2:2023cv03543
Plaintiff:
M.B. Hutson
Defendant:
Thomas L. Harper, Esq., R. Wayne Byrd Estate, John Wilkerson, Esq. and others
Fortune v. Graham et al
as 2:2023cv00463
Plaintiff:
Jason Fortune
Defendant:
Cheryl Graham, Lisa Green, Dorchester County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. McMaster et al
as 3:2015cv02177
Plaintiff:
Samuel N Smith
Defendant:
Henry D McMaster, Jean H Toal, Rick Quinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
M v. South Carolina Department of Social Services et al
as 3:2015cv02084
Plaintiff:
T M
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Social Services , Irene Williams , April Fogle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Haley et al
as 3:2015cv00547
Plaintiff:
Regina M Hunter
Defendant:
Nikki R Haley, Gary A Mixon, Naomi D Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Todd v. Graham et al
as 3:2015cv00283
Plaintiff:
Leamon Bradley Todd
Defendant:
Lindsey Graham, Venus Enterprises and Cheri Magazine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Proveaux v. United Technologies Corporation et al
as 5:2014cv02742
Plaintiff:
Daniel Proveaux
Defendant:
United Technologies Corporation , Delavan Inc , Delavan Spray LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Murray v. Kligman et al
as 3:2014cv02581
Plaintiff:
Isaac Murray
Defendant:
Milton Kligman, Barack Obama, Vice President Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Toal et al
as 3:2014cv00507
Plaintiff:
Samuel N Smith
Defendant:
Jean H Toal, Rick Quinn, T Stephen Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
