Cases 1 - 10 of 209
Glaspie v. Flory et al
as 3:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Kevin Neal Glaspie
Defendant:
Craig Flory, S Sprabery, FNU Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glaspie v. Flory et al
as 4:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Kevin Neal Glaspie
Defendant:
Craig Flory, S Sprabery, FNU Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv01072
Petitioner:
John Carlton Graham
Respondent:
TDCJ and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00984
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mullins v. Graham et al
as 4:2023cv00881
Plaintiff:
Sharda L. Mullins
Defendant:
C. Graham, B Caver, S. Sprabary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mullins v Graham et al
as 4:2023cv01004
Plaintiff:
Sharda L. Mullins
Defendant:
Sergeant C. Graham, Chief Deputy B. Caver, S. Sprabary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Graham v. TDCJ
as 4:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
John Carlton Graham
Defendant:
TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Graham v. Waybourn
as 4:2023cv00907
Petitioner:
Gladys Maria Graham
Respondent:
Unknown Defendants (4:23-CV-907-O) and Warden Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Graham v. Unknown Defendants
as 4:2023cv00714
Plaintiff:
Gladys Maria Graham and Gladys Maria Graham-O
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Watts et al
as 2:2021cv00071
Defendant:
Janis Graham Jack, Sandra L Watts, Kristen D'Ann Langford and others
Plaintiff:
Ruben Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
