Cases 1 - 8 of 8
ESTATE OF DOUGLAS ALMOND WIGGINGTON v. SILVER et al
as 1:2018cv01138
Defendant:
AXON ENTERPRISE, INC., CITY OF GREENFIELD, INDIANA, GREENFIELD CITY COUNCIL and others
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF DOUGLAS ALMOND WIGGINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BALDWIN et al v. GREENFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2018cv00246
Plaintiff:
TRICIA BALDWIN
Defendant:
CITY OF GREENFIELD, INDIANA, GREENFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, HANCOCK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
FAIR et al v. CITY OF GREENFIELD et al
as 1:2015cv01357
Defendant:
CITY OF GREENFIELD, DAN DEVOY, HANCOCK COUNTY COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
C. F., JARROD FAIR, SUSAN FAIR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MUELLER v. CITY OF GREENFIELD et al
as 1:2015cv00087
Defendant:
CITY OF GREENFIELD, CALEB FREEMAN and GREENFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
WAYNE MUELLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
RIHM et al v. HANCOCK COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY et al
as 1:2012cv01474
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 5, GREENFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, HANCOCK COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY and others
Plaintiff:
MARY RIHM and RECHO ROWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2246
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
RUSSELL v. HANCOCK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2008cv00582
Plaintiff:
MATT RUSSELL
Defendant:
HANCOCK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, HANCOCK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, GREENFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
