Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Rufus Anderson v. J. A. Piper Roofing Co.
as 20-2221
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUFUS J. C. ANDERSON, a/k/a Rufus Julius C. Anderson, a/k/a Rufus Julius Corneliu Anderson, formerly #165323
Defendant / Appellee:
J. A. PIPER ROOFING COMPANY
Defendant:
GREENVILLE HEALTH SYSTEM
Rufus Anderson v. Greenville Health System
as 19-1322
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUFUS J. C. ANDERSON, a/k/a Rufus Julius C. Anderson, a/k/a Rufus J. Anderson
Defendant / Appellee:
GREENVILLE HEALTH SYSTEM
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv00859
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Greenville Health System et al v. Zareei
as 8:2018cv01916
3Rd Party Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of South Carolina
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Genda Anita Zareei
Plaintiff:
Greenville Health System and GHS Partners in Health Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Greenville Health System v. Quality Logistics Inc et al
as 6:2018cv01258
Plaintiff:
Greenville Health System
Defendant:
Quality Logistics Inc and Quality Logistics Inc Employee Welfare Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv01825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv01051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Greenville Health System v. Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield Keycare Plan
as 6:2015cv02591
Plaintiff:
Greenville Health System
Defendant:
Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield KeyCare Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
