Cases 1 - 10 of 102
MORGAN v. DOZIER et al
as 7:2021cv00164
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO LAMAR MORGAN
Defendant:
GREGORY C DOZIER, CHRISTOPHER CARR, MICHAEL BARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foreman v. Ward et al
as 6:2020cv00026
Defendant:
Gregory C. Dozier, Deric Godfrey, Adrian Nelson and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Foreman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyncoln Danglar v. State of Georgia, et al
as 19-15042
Defendant / Appellee:
GREGORY C. DOZIER, sued in his offical and individual capacity, as Commissioner of the State of Georgia Department of Corrections, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SMITH SP WARDEN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LYNCOLN DANGLAR
Rust v. Hininger et al
as 3:2019cv00083
Defendant:
Damon T. Hininger, Gregory C. Dozier, Dr. Yvonne Neau and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Shane Rust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAYTON v. BRASHER et al
as 5:2019cv00398
Defendant:
MARTIN, LT INGRAM, EASTER and others
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. DOZIER et al
as 1:2019cv00175
Plaintiff:
TESFA MILLER
Defendant:
Warden WALTER BERRY, GREGORY C DOZIER and KENNETH MANTLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Dozier et al
as 1:2019cv04404
Defendant:
Walter Berry, Kenneth Mantle and Gregory C. Dozier
Plaintiff:
Tesfa Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LLOYD v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2019cv00353
Defendant:
JACK RANDALL SAULS, CLAY NIX, RICKY MYRICK and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOSEPH LLOYD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv01404
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MITCHELL v. DOZIER et al
as 5:2019cv00333
Plaintiff:
DRASHAWN MITCHELL
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER GREGORY C DOZIER, CO1 VICTORIA LAMAR and WARDEN ANNETTIA L ASHLEY-TOBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
