Cases 1 - 10 of 25
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. KILBY et al
as 1:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
TAYMAR FREDERICK WILLIAMS
Defendant:
WARDEN RICHARD KILBY, WARDEN OF SECURITY MCCLUNG, COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 22-10632
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, former Commissioner, HOMER BRYSON, former Commissioner and others
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 7:2020cv00089
Defendant:
CLYDE ALLEN, LISA FOUNTAIN, JACK KOON and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAKER v. WARD
as 5:2019cv00365
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, PARALEGAL JAMIE A VALLEE, LISA FOUNTAIN and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAKER v. DOZIER et al
as 5:2018cv00245
Defendant:
CHIEF COUNSELOR STREETER, BRUCE CHATMAN, MEDICAL DIRECTOR SHARON LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HANNAH v. ADMINISTRATOR ALBERT C. WAGNER YOUTH CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2017cv08066
Plaintiff:
KARON HANNAH
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR ALBERT C. WAGNER YOUTH CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, MARK GOODMAN, M. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Upshaw v. Hall et al
as 3:2017cv00029
Plaintiff:
Todd Upshaw
Defendant:
Phillip Hall, Barbara Grant, Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FREDRICK v. MCLAUGHLIN
as 3:2017cv00056
Petitioner:
DANTE G FREDRICK
Respondent:
GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamon Jackson v. Gregory McLaughlin, et al
as 17-11301
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMON DEMETRIUS JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, Macon State Prison, MARTY ALLEN, Valdosta State Prison, THOMAS FRAZIER, Hancock State Prison and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
