Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Webb v. City of Crossville, TN et al
as 2:2025cv00018
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ryan Webb
Defendant:
City of Crossville, TN, (f/n/u) Cooper and Rhea County, TN Sheriff Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Webb v. Ridley
as 2:2025cv00007
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ryan Webb
Defendant:
William T. Ridley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Webb v. Hill et al
as 3:2025cv00019
Defendant:
Quality of Life Home Healthcare, Jessica Danielle Hill, Josh Tollett and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ryan Webb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Webb v. TN Unemployment et al
as 3:2025cv00020
Defendant:
Joshua Tollett Masonry and TN Unemployment
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ryan Webb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Webb v. Verizon Wireless Crossville, TN
as 3:2025cv00022
Defendant:
Verizon Wireless Crossville, TN
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ryan Webb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Webb v. DHS Dayton, TN et al
as 3:2025cv00021
Defendant:
BlueCare, TennCare and DHS Dayton, TN
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ryan Webb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Webb v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2024cv00085
Petitioner:
Gregory Ryan Webb
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Webb v. Citizens Equity First Credit Union et al
as 1:2024cv01482
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ryan Webb
Defendant:
Citizens Equity First Credit Union and CEFCU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Webb v. Board of Judicial Conduct TN et al
as 3:2024cv01307
Defendant:
Governor Bill Lee, Board of Judicial Conduct TN and Cameron Sexton
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ryan Webb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Webb v. Hill et al
as 3:2024cv03303
Defendant:
Jessica Danielle Hill and Josh Tollett
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ryan Webb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
