Cases 1 - 10 of 1,711
Guzman v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLC
as 3:2024cv02449
Plaintiff:
Olaf Garcia Guzman
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jimenez-Guzman, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2534
Petitioner:
MARTHA ELIZABETH JIMENEZ-GUZMAN and SAMUEL ANDRES DIAZ-JIMENEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Vela v. Medeles, et al.
as 1:2024cv00471
Plaintiff:
Daniel Guzman Vela
Defendant:
Rey Medeles, Gustavo Gutierrez and The City of Fresno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shallowhorn v. Lopez, et al.
as 24-2484
Plaintiff:
ALFRED EUGENE SHALLOWHORN
Defendant:
R. LOPEZ, Correctional Officer, Y. CASTILLO, Correctional officer, H. MOSELEY, Correctional Officer and others
Guzman Vela v. Medeles et al
as 1:2024at00335
Plaintiff:
Daniel Guzman Vela
Defendant:
Rey Medeles, Gustavo Gutierrez, Unknown Law Enforcement Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guzman v. Walmart
as 3:2024cv02353
Plaintiff:
Jaime Guzman
Defendant:
Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Guzman Velasco, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2429
Petitioner:
MARIA GUZMAN VELASCO, CAMILA ECHEVERRIA GUZMAN and NAYELI ECHEVERRIA GUZMAN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Western Arbor Partners L.P v. Ariana Calva Perez et al
as 8:2024cv00798
Plaintiff:
Western Arbor Partners L.P
Defendant:
Ariana Calva Perez, Irma Guzman De Catriz, Marcelo Guzman and others
Reinoso-Guzman, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2211
Petitioner:
ERICKA JEANETH REINOSO-GUZMAN and ANGIE MILAGROS GARCIA-REINOSO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Guzman et al v. 503 Entertainment, LLC
as 3:2024cv00574
Plaintiff:
Andra Cheri Rose, Jessica Golden, Janet Guzman and others
Defendant:
503 Entertainment, LLC doing business as Studio 503
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
