Cases 21 - 30 of 1,716
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Joe Lewis Valentine v. F. Guzman
as 2:2024cv02127
Petitioner:
Joe Lewis Valentine
Respondent:
F. Guzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frank Eddie Quintero v. Fidencio Guzman
as 2:2024cv02120
Petitioner:
Frank Eddie Quintero
Respondent:
Fidencio Guzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guzman-Guerrero, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1454
Petitioner:
TERESA GUZMAN-GUERRERO and ALONDRA ABARCA-GUZMAN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Carter v. Guzman
as 3:2024cv00477
Petitioner:
Dante Danil Carter
Respondent:
F. Guzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Camargo Rincon, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1376
Petitioner:
CAMILO ANDRE CAMARGO RINCON, CLAUDIA MARCELA SANCHEZ-GUZMAN and ANDRES SANTIAGO CAMARGO-SANCHEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
JMG Investments Inc. v. U.S. Small Business Administration et al
as 2:2024cv01677
Plaintiff:
JMG Investments, Inc. and JMG Investments Inc.
Defendant:
U.S. Small Business Administration, Isabel Casillas Guzman, The United States Small Business Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Shallowhorn v. Carrillo et al
as 3:2024cv00399
Plaintiff:
Alfred E. Shallowhorn
Defendant:
J. Carrillo, F. Nunez, J. Galindo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Pino-Guzman, et al. v. Garland
as 24-971
Petitioner:
CARLOS PINO-GUZMAN, ANA MARROQUIN-LOPEZ and CARLOS PINO-MARROQUIN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
