Cases 71 - 80 of 5,931
Frank Eddie Quintero v. Fidencio Guzman
as 2:2024cv02120
Petitioner:
Frank Eddie Quintero
Respondent:
Fidencio Guzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guzman-Guerrero, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1454
Petitioner:
TERESA GUZMAN-GUERRERO and ALONDRA ABARCA-GUZMAN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Malka v. Small Business Administration et al
as 0:2024cv60396
Plaintiff:
Albert Malka
Defendant:
Small Business Administration, Director Isabella Casillas Guzman, Janet Yellen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Camargo Rincon, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1376
Petitioner:
CAMILO ANDRE CAMARGO RINCON, CLAUDIA MARCELA SANCHEZ-GUZMAN and ANDRES SANTIAGO CAMARGO-SANCHEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Carter v. Guzman
as 3:2024cv00477
Petitioner:
Dante Danil Carter
Respondent:
F. Guzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MARTINEZ-GUZMAN v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv02156
Petitioner:
EDWIN MARTINEZ-GUZMAN
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Guzman v. Allstate County Mutual Insurance Company
as 3:2024cv00588
Plaintiff:
Casta Guzman
Defendant:
Allstate County Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Erlinda Ortiz-Funes, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3196
Petitioner:
ERLINDA ORTIZ-FUNES and CARLOS JAVIER GUZMAN-ORTIZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Guzman Marroquin v. Patel et al
as 1:2024cv01927
Plaintiff:
Juan Guzman Marroquin
Defendant:
Manish Patel, Mihir Patel and Shiwam, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Guzman v. Lillard
as 3:2024cv00681
Petitioner:
Jessie Guzman, III
Respondent:
Thomas Lillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
