Cases 11 - 20 of 104
Kane et al v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 9:2022cv81287
Plaintiff:
Brian Patrick Kane, Zayne Aneed Elias Otero, Camilo Andres Orozco Elias and others
Defendant:
Attorney General MERRICK GARLAND, Gabriel Gonzalez, Director Christopher Wray and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
GONZALEZ-ARMIJO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12105
Plaintiff:
JUAN GABRIEL GONZALEZ-ARMIJO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv08090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Gabriel Gonzalez v. John Yates
as 21-2868
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gabriel Gonzalez
Defendant / Appellee:
John P. Yates, Warden, Forrest City FCC (Originally named Dewayne Hendrix)
Mendez De La Rosa et al v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2021cv04692
Plaintiff:
Marllury Mendez De La Rosa and Cleopatra A Urena
Defendant:
Gabriel Gonzalez and Jonbud Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv06403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Gonzalez Martinez v. Garland
as 21-265
Petitioner:
GABRIEL GONZALEZ MARTINEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Olivo (Clase)
as 21-874
Defendant:
Carlos Acosta, Wayne Scott, Jesus Mata and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Anthony Clase
USA v. Gabriel Gonzalez
as 21-50072
Defendant / Appellant:
GABRIEL GONZALEZ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Saiger LLC v. Andersson et al
as 1:2020cv24672
Plaintiff:
Saiger LLC, d/b/a Laif. Works and Saiger LLC doing business as Laif.Works
Defendant:
Gabriel Gonzalez Andersson and Glezco, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
