Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Salas v. Ramirez
as 24-10378
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Salas
Defendant:
FNU Ramirez, Correctional Officer, Kristine Carouth, Nurse (LVN) and Tarrant County Corrections Center Jail
Salas v. Ramirez et al
as 4:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Salas
Defendant:
FNU Ramirez, Kristine Carouth and Tarrant County Corrections Center Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salas v. Correctional Officer Acosta et al
as 4:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Salas
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Acosta and Correctional Officer Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salas v. Correctional Officer Acosta et al
as 4:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Salas, Gabriel Salascio and Gabriel Paul Salas
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Acosta and Correctional Officer Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Salas v. Waybboun
as 4:2023cv01254
Petitioner:
Gabriel Salas
Respondent:
Sheriff Bill Waybboun and Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Salas v. Waybourn
as 4:2023cv01001
Petitioner:
Gabriel Salas
Respondent:
Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Salas v. Waybourn
as 4:2023cv00539
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Salas, Gabriel Salascio and Gabriel Paul Salas
Defendant:
Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salas v. Waybourn
as 4:2023cv00424
Petitioner:
Gabriel Salas
Respondent:
Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Meyers v. Waybourn
as 4:2023cv00139
Petitioner:
Michael Meyers, Boogey Man, Gabriel Salas and others
Respondent:
Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Salas v. Waybourn
as 4:2022cv00885
Petitioner:
Gabriel Salas
Respondent:
Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
