Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Edmonds v. 1226Murr LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01914
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Edmonds
Defendant:
1226Murr LLC an Arizona company doing business as All-Star Grooming Pet Boarding Daycare & Training and Gordon Gage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Gage v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
as 2:2022cv01609
Plaintiff:
Mally Gage
Defendant:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01589
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Martinez et al v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2021cv01212
Plaintiff:
Phil Martinez and Jorge Soria
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Benjamin Moore, Douglas McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2020cv01367
Plaintiff:
Jamaar Williams
Defendant:
Joseph Gage, Phoenix, City of, Francisco Barrios and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huddleston v. Kay Chemical Company et al
as 2:2020cv01011
Defendant:
Ecolab Incorporated, Unknown Parties, ADS Foods LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Gage Huddleston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Churilla et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2019cv05350
Plaintiff:
Ida Gonzales, Zvonimir Burin, Daniel Detaranto and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02745
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gage v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv03277
Plaintiff:
Darlene M Gage
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
