Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Murphy v. Triple-S Management Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10259
Plaintiff:
John Murphy
Defendant:
Triple-S Management Corporation, Roberto Garcia-Rodriguez, Luis A. Clavell-Rodriguez and others
CICCOTELLI v. TRIPLE-S MANAGEMENT CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv05221
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Defendant:
TRIPLE-S MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, LUIS A CLAVELL RODRIGUEZ, CARI M DOMINGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Ryan v. Triple-S Management Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv09827
Plaintiff:
John Ryan
Defendant:
Triple-S Management Corporation, Stephen L. Ondra, Roberto Garcia-Rodriguez and others
Morgan v. Triple-S Management Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv09855
Plaintiff:
Anthony Morgan
Defendant:
Triple-S Management Corporation, Stephen L. Ondra, Roberto Garcia-Rodriguez and others
Gaud v. Triple-S Management Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv09312
Plaintiff:
Edwin Gaud
Defendant:
Triple-S Management Corporation, Cari M. Dominguez, Roberta Herman and others
Whitfield v. Triple-S Management Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv08718
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Triple-S Management Corporation, Luis A. Clavell Rodriguez, Cari M. Dominguez and others
Ortega v. Triple-S Management Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv08392
Plaintiff:
Humberto Ortega
Defendant:
Triple-S Management Corporation, Roberto Garca-Rodrguez, Luis A. Clavell-Rodrguez and others
Sherman v. SEACOR Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv11020
Defendant:
Gail B. Harris, Christopher P. Papouras, SEACOR Holdings Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Sherman
GERVAIS v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv04496
Defendant:
"XYZ CORP", MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., "JANE DOE" and others
Plaintiff:
GAIL B GERVAIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Greene v. Robinson et al
as 3:2020cv00305
Plaintiff:
Corey Greene
Defendant:
Allegra Montgomery Walker and Gail B. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
