Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Romain v. Kieselowsky et al
as 3:2023cv01526
Plaintiff: Steven Romain
Defendant: Matthew Kieselowsky, Dr. Dan Galvan, Jane Doe Nurse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROTHENBERG v. GALVANIZED BRANDS, LLC
as 5:2022cv03332
Plaintiff: DEBRA ROTHENBERG
Defendant: GALVANIZED BRANDS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01958
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
John Utesch v. Lannett Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2021mc00066
Plaintiff: JOHN UTESCH and UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Defendant: LANNETT COMPANY, INC., ARTHUR P. BEDROSIAN and MARTIN P. GALVAN
Special Master: BRUCE MERENSTEIN
CONRAD v. BEDROSIAN et al
as 2:2019cv03197
Defendant: JEFFREY FARBER, DAVID DRABIK, JOHN KOZLOWSKI and others
Plaintiff: JOHN J. CONRAD
Nominal Defendant: LANNETT COMPANY, INC.
STROUGO v. LANNETT COMPANY, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv03635
Defendant: TIMOTHY C. CREW, LANNETT COMPANY, INC. and MARTIN P. GALVAN
Plaintiff: ROBERT STROUGO
Petitioner: SOE WONG, SHOUFENG LI, MICHAEL HOELTZEL and others
SHAMOON v. BEDROSIAN et al
as 2:2018cv03070
Defendant: JEFFREY FARBER, PAUL TAVEIRA, DAVID DRABIK and others
Plaintiff: EDWARD SHAMOON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
MORALES v. RETRIEVAL MASTERS CREDITORS BUREAU, INC.
as 2:2017cv04788
Plaintiff: DIANA GALVAN MORALES
Defendant: RETRIEVAL MASTERS CREDITORS BUREAU, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CURRIE v. NEVILLE GALVANIZING, INC.
as 2:2017cv00771
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY CURRIE
Defendant: NEVILLE GALVANIZING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
GALVAN-GONZALEZ v. SMITH
as 3:2017cv00091
Petitioner: JAIME GALVAN-GONZALEZ
Respondent: CHRISTIAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?