Cases 1 - 10 of 186
United States v. Carlos Morales Mariscal
as 24-1944
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Carlos Ulices Morales Mariscal, also known as Carlos Uleces Rodriges Gamboa, also known as Pecha
Smith v. Gamboa, et al.
as 24-2790
Petitioner:
RONALD J. SMITH
Respondent:
MARTIN GAMBOA, Warden and ROB BONTA, Attorney General, State of California
Gamboa-Avila v. HHS
as 24-1765
Petitioner:
JOSE GAMBOA-AVILA
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Hoglan et al v. Soulas et al
as 1:2024mc21627
Plaintiff:
Candyce S Hoglan, Kui Liong Lee, Kiu Liong Lee and others
Defendant:
Nicole Soulas, Frederick Soulas and Jordan Steiner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Hoglan et al v. M/V Bluefins, IMO Number 922657 et al
as 1:2024mc21628
Plaintiff:
Ju-Hsiu Jian, Jason Ruben Moreno, Christian B Stallworth and others
Defendant:
M/V Bluefins, IMO Number 922657, M/V Boceanica, IMO Number 9267132, M/V B Luminosa, IMO Number 9256016 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Gamboa
as 4:2024cv01168
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Maria A. Gamboa a/k/a Maria A. Cantu and d/b/a Micheladas El Norte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wilson v. Gamboa, et al.
as 24-1818
Petitioner:
LUKE NOEL WILSON
Respondent:
MARTIN GAMBOA, Warden, Avenal State Prison and ROB BONTA, Attorney General, State of California
Gamboa v. Apple Inc.
as 5:2024cv01270
Plaintiff:
Julianna Felix Gamboa
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Hill v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 24-1583
Petitioner:
NATHAN HILL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Interested Party:
GAVIN NEWSOM, RALPH DIAZ, Director of CDCR, KEN CLARK, Warden of CSP-Corcoran and others
United States v. Michael Gamboa
as 24-1387
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael Gerald Gamboa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
