Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Linfo IP, LLC v. The Gap, Inc.
as 6:2023cv00635
Plaintiff:
Linfo IP, LLC
Defendant:
The Gap, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
S3G Technology LLC v. The Gap, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
S3G Technology LLC
Defendant:
The Gap, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Advanced Transactions, LLC v. The Gap, Inc.
as 6:2023cv00163
Plaintiff:
Advanced Transactions, LLC
Defendant:
The Gap, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Recog IP LLC v. The Gap, Inc.
as 6:2022cv01261
Plaintiff:
Recog IP LLC
Defendant:
The Gap, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Lexos Media IP, LLC v The Gap, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00299
Plaintiff:
Lexos Media IP, LLC
Defendant:
The Gap, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
M4siz Limited v. GAP INC.
as 6:2022cv00735
Plaintiff:
M4siz Limited
Defendant:
GAP INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC v. The Gap, Inc.
as 4:2021cv00554
Plaintiff:
Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC
Defendant:
The Gap, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Hitel Technologies LLC v. GAP, Inc.
as 6:2020cv01205
Plaintiff:
Hitel Technologies LLC
Defendant:
GAP, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Human Differential Intelligence, LLC v. The Gap, Inc.
as 6:2020cv00307
Plaintiff:
Human Differential Intelligence, LLC
Defendant:
The Gap, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Parallel Networks, LLC v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co. et al
as 6:2010cv00111
Defendant:
Kayak Software Corporation, Orbitz Worldwide Inc, Yahoo! Inc and others
Consolidated Defendant:
JAG Footwear, Accessories and Retail Corporation, Onestop Internet, Inc., HSN LP and others
Plaintiff:
Parallel Networks, LLC
Not Yet Classified:
Richard Grainger, Michael McLemore and Robert W Faulkner
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
