Other Statutory Actions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Bourgeois v. The Gap, Inc., et al
as 24-1150
Plaintiff: JODI BOURGEOIS
Defendant: GAP, INC., OLD NAVY INC., BANANA REPUBLIC and others
Bourgeois v. The Gap, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00394
Plaintiff: Jodi Bourgeois
Defendant: The Gap, Inc., Old Navy, LLC, Banana Republic, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Jones et al v. The Raymond Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022mc80074
Plaintiff: Rodney Jones and Deangela Battle
Intervenor: New Hampshire Insurance Company
Defendant: The Raymond Corporation
Not Classified By Court: The Gap, Inc.
Kaible v. The Gap, Inc. et al
as 0:2017cv62408
Plaintiff: Adriana Kaible
Defendant: The Gap, Inc. and Old Navy, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pallagrosi v. The Gap, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv05905
Plaintiff: Michael Pallagrosi
Defendant: The Gap, Inc., Gap (Apparel), LLC, Gap International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hardigree v. The Gap, Inc.
as 3:2017cv03840
Plaintiff: Julie Hardigree
Defendant: The Gap, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tatro v. Sterling Jewelers Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv01305
Defendant: Sterling Jewelers Inc., T-Mobile, USA, Inc., Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Michael P. Tatro
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Jalen Epps v. Gap Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv03424
Defendant: Does and Gap, Inc.
Plaintiff: Jalen Epps
Campbell v. Gap, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00081
Plaintiff: Roy Campbell
Defendant: Gap, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
REVOLAZE, LLC et al v. ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO. et al
as 1:2014mc01441
Plaintiff: REVOLAZE, LLC and TECHNOLINES, LLC
Defendant: ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO., AMERICAN EAGLE OUTFITTERS, INC., BBC APPAREL GROUP, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: MS:MiscOrd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?