Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Dunhoft v. Gap, Inc. Short Term Disability Plan et al
as 2:2011cv00609
Plaintiff:
Peggy Dunhoft
Defendant:
Gap, Inc. Short Term Disability Plan and Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Stevenson v. Gap Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv02241
Plaintiff:
Pamela Stevenson
Defendant:
504 Gap Inc. Disability Plans and The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Stevenson v. Gap Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv02241
Plaintiff:
Pamela Stevenson
Defendant:
Gap Inc., 504 Gap Inc. Disability Plans and The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Vance v. Life Insurance Company of North America et al
as 3:2010cv00471
Plaintiff:
Janalee Vance
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America, Cigna Group Insurance, Gap Inc. Short Term Disability Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Storer v. Prudential Insurance Company of America et al
as 1:2008cv00788
Plaintiff:
Deborah S. Storer
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America and Gap, Inc. Long-Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Perkins v. Gap, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv00160
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Siemer Perkins
Defendant:
Gap, Inc., Tops-Leave Administration for Gap, Inc., Prudential Financial and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carleton v. 504 Gap, Inc. Disability Plans et al
as 3:2007cv05924
Plaintiff:
David Carleton and David Carleton
Defendant:
504 Gap, Inc. Disability Plans and The Gap, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Carleton v. 502 Gap, Inc. Health Insurance Plan et al
as 3:2007cv03299
Plaintiff:
David Carleton
Defendant:
502 Gap, Inc. Health Insurance Plan and The Gap, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
