Cases 1 - 10 of 359
Garcia v. FBI et al
as 5:2023cv00329
Plaintiff:
Adam Leal Garcia
Defendant:
FBI and CIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Rokosky
as 1:2023cv00424
Petitioner:
Enrique Garcia
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Garcia v. Ray
as 5:2023cv00209
Petitioner:
Segundo Tarquino Guero Garcia and Segundo Tarquino Cuero Garcia
Respondent:
H. L. Ray and Heather L. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Garcia-Garcia v. Rokosky et al
as 1:2023cv00207
Petitioner:
Juan Garcia-Garcia
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky and Acting Warden LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Garcia v. Rokosky et al
as 1:2023cv00153
Petitioner:
Dante Diaz Garcia
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky and Warden LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Garcia-Garcia v. Rokosky et al
as 3:2023cv00016
Petitioner:
Juan Garcia-Garcia
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky and Acting Warden LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Garcia v. Rokosky et al
as 5:2023cv00021
Petitioner:
Dante Diaz Garcia
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky and Acting Warden LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Garcia v. LeFever
as 1:2022cv00590
Petitioner:
David Perez Garcia
Respondent:
Warden M. LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Garcia v. Roane
as 5:2022cv00287
Petitioner:
Leonel A. Garcia
Respondent:
Warden Roane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Garcia v. Warden Roane
as 3:2022cv00196
Petitioner:
Leonel A. Garcia
Respondent:
Warden Roane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
