Cases 41 - 50 of 65
CARRIZALES v. USA
as 1:2013cv01041
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
IGNACIO GARCIA CARRIZALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00953
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
BUENDIA DE LA ROSA et al v. PLYMOUTH NURSERY, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00516
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ANGEL BUENDIA DE LA ROSA and MIGUEL ANGEL CRUZ GARCIA
Defendant:
PLYMOUTH NURSERY, LLC and CHRISTOPHER S. AVIS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
GARCIA-RODRIGUEZ v. USA
as 1:2013cv00442
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
FERNANDO GARCIA-RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
SANCHEZ et al v. TRUSE TRUCKING, INC.
as 1:2013cv00415
Plaintiff:
ERICK GARCIA SANCHEZ , JOSUE CHAN CHAG , MIGUEL A. ROJAS TUMALAN and others
Defendant:
TRUSE TRUCKING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
GARCIA-VAZQUEZ v. USA
as 1:2013cv00025
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
VICENTE GARCIA-VAZQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. TEUTLE et al
as 1:2012cv01319
Plaintiff:
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
PEDRO MENDOZA TEUTLE and NOHEMI RIOS GARCIA
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized Publication/Use of Communications
GARCIA-IBARRA v. N.C. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY
as 1:2012cv01259
Petitioner:
ISMAEL A. GARCIA-IBARRA
Respondent:
N.C. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GARCIA-IBARRA v. N.C. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY
as 1:2012cv01194
Petitioner:
ISMAEL A. GARCIA-IBARRA
Respondent:
N.C. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FERNANDEZ-GARCIA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2012cv01137
Petitioner:
MARTHA CECILIA FERNANDEZ-GARCIA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
