Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Housing Opportunities Made Equal of Virginia, Inc. et al v. Everett
as 3:2022cv00174
Plaintiff:
Housing Opportunities Made Equal of Virginia, Inc. and Chastity Katelin Garcia
Defendant:
Lawrence White Everett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Kirsch v. Stolle et al
as 2:2020cv00371
Defendant:
Lois Thompson, Christie Garcia, Ronald Watts and others
Plaintiff:
Danny Kirsch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Nelligar v. Eaton et al
as 1:2018cv00508
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wade Nelligar
Defendant:
Corporal Eaton, Clerk of United States District Court, United States District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keeler v. Taylor et al
as 4:2017cv00130
Plaintiff:
Hieda Keeler
Defendant:
Judge Wilford Taylor, Douglas Hertz , Shane A. Lacasse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berry v. Target Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv00897
Plaintiff:
Mona Lisa Berry
Defendant:
Target Corporation and Jonas Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Garcia v. Holden et al
as 1:2015cv01324
Plaintiff:
Christian Garcia
Defendant:
Gregory Holden and Douglas Serven
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Altamira-Rojas et al v. The City of Richmond et al
as 3:2015cv00488
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Altamira-Rojas , Ojilvia Moreno-Solano , Nieves Moreno-Solano and others
Defendant:
The City of Richmond , John Walsh , Mark Bridgman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Alfaro-Garcia v. Henrico County et al
as 3:2015cv00349
Plaintiff:
Jaime S. Alfaro-Garcia
Defendant:
Henrico County, Michael L. Wade and John Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
