Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv05067
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Cooper v. United States Of America et al
as 1:2019cv00312
Petitioner:
Gary Cooper
Respondent:
United States Of America and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SYREK et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05910
Plaintiff:
JOHN SYREK , GREGORY ADAMS , SHIRLEY MCCOY and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TARANGO et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05822
Plaintiff:
CARLOS TARANGO , GREGORY ADAMS , MARY BARKSDALE and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HICKLIN v. B.C. STONE, INC. et al
as 3:2010cv00320
Plaintiff:
BRENDA HICKLIN
Defendant:
B.C. STONE, INC. , RODNEY K. BAIR , TRAVIS L. COLLINS and others
Mediator:
KEITH A. PESTO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
COBB et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv05095
Plaintiff:
DONNA F. COBB , GARY COOPER , JAMES FRANK and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
COOPER v. BOBST GROUP NORTH AMERICA
as 2:2007cv04620
Plaintiff:
GARY COOPER
Defendant:
BOBST GROUP NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
WALDON POND DEVELOPMENT, INC. et al v. COOPER
as 2:2007cv00214
Plaintiff:
WALDON POND DEVELOPMENT, INC., WALDON POND DEVELOPMENT, INC., RUCCI DEVELOPMENT CO., INC. and others
Defendant:
GARY COOPER, GARY COOPER, GARY COOPER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
WALDEN POND DEVELOPMENT, INC. v. RUCCI
as 2:2007cv00036
Defendant:
SEBASTIAN RUCCI and SEBASTIAN RUCCI
Plaintiff:
GARY COOPER, GARY COOPER and GARY COOPER
Movant:
DAN PIKUR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
