Cases filed in Kentucky
Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Matthews v. USP McCreary et al
as 6:2024cv00062
Plaintiff: Louis R. Matthews
Defendant: USP McCreary, Colette Peters, John Gilley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00002
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Stokes v. Garland et al
as 6:2023cv00206
Petitioner: Anthony Darnell Stokes
Respondent: Merrick B. Garland, Gary Swaney and United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wagoner v. Garland
as 7:2023cv00091
Plaintiff: Shera Wagoner
Defendant: Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 151 Labor: Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00307
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Garland v. USA
as 5:2023cv00181
Petitioner: Jonathan E. Garland
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00157
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00029
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00007
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00677
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?