Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Garrett v. Cromwell
as 2:2023cv00031
Petitioner:
Leon Garrett, Jr
Respondent:
Warden Daniel Cromwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wiersig, Daniel v. St. Croix County, WI et al
as 3:2022cv00294
Plaintiff:
Daniel M. Wiersig
Defendant:
St. Croix Counrt, WI, Offficer/Sheriff Joshua Pinkos, Officer/Sheriff Matthew Grothe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Juarez v. Beth et al
as 2:2021cv01092
Plaintiff:
David C Juarez
Defendant:
Bill E Beth, David G Beth, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett v. Paul et al
as 2:2021cv00638
Defendant:
Sgt Ziabel, Capt Belongia, Sgt S Paul and others
Plaintiff:
Jacoby P Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nundahl, Garrett v. Dickman, Ashley et al
as 3:2021cv00289
Defendant:
Ashley T. Dickman, Wisconsin Department Of Corrections and Jennifer L. King
Plaintiff:
Garrett Lue Nundahl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phipps, Garrett v. Saul, Andrew
as 3:2021cv00246
Plaintiff:
Garrett Phipps
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Banks et al v. Doe et al
as 2:2020cv01437
Defendant:
Officer Mcinnes, US Bank Trust Association, Officer Grabonski and others
Plaintiff:
Verna Banks and Ira R Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Rees et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2020cv00554
Plaintiff:
Garrett Rees and Tricia Rees
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc, Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc and CR Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ferguson v. Lamora
as 1:2019cv01320
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin, Kevin Lamora and Kevin T Lamora
Plaintiff:
Garrett Ferguson and Garrett M Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
