Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Price et al v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Garry Don Price and Janine R. Price
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Tate et al v. City of Bartlesville et al
as 4:2022cv00521
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Tate, Garry W Richardson and Kelly R Dickey
Defendant:
City of Bartlesville, Neighborhood Services Code Enforcement, Mila Wickham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00555
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Clervrain et al v. Lankford et al
as 5:2022cv00283
Plaintiff:
Biglauwick Plaisimond, Manetirony Clervrain, Wesline Casir and others
Defendant:
James Lankford, Jim Inhofe, Stephanie Bice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Nunn
as 4:2021cv00445
Petitioner:
Garry Wayne Wilson
Respondent:
Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BOK Financial Equipment Finance, Inc. v. GDS Transport, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00277
Plaintiff:
BOK Financial Equipment Finance, Inc.
Defendant:
GDS Transport, LLC, Logisticorp, L.L.C, H5 Fleet Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson v. Tulsa County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2021cv00136
Defendant:
Paul Huss, Tulsa County Sheriff's Department and Michael Heisten
Plaintiff:
Garry W Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Pettigrew
as 4:2020cv00533
Petitioner:
Garry L Harris
Respondent:
Luke Pettigrew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00948
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Garris v. Delaware County State of Oklahoma
as 4:2020cv00395
Respondent:
Delaware County
Petitioner:
Robby Dean Garris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
