Cases 1 - 10 of 70
DOUGHTY v. SIMPLE PLEASURES LOBSTER INC et al
as 2:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
JAMES DOUGHTY
Defendant:
SIMPLE PLEASURES LOBSTER INC and GARY HAWKES, JR
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
BARTH v. WATERBORO et al
as 2:2023cv00295
Defendant:
MARILYN MILLER, TOWN OF WATERBORO, GARY LAMB and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN S BARTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FRANCK v. LEWISTON VA CLINIC et al
as 2:2023cv00248
Plaintiff:
JOHN FRANCK
Defendant:
LEWISTON VA CLINIC, DOREEN HUNT, EDWARD STEELE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. WINN
as 2:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF MAINE
Defendant:
GARY S WINN DO
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
MARTIN v. SOMERSET COUNTY et al
as 1:2021cv00199
Plaintiff:
YVONNE MARTIN
Defendant:
SOMERSET COUNTY, DALE LANCASTER, GARY CRAFTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARTH v. TOWN OF WATERBORO et al
as 2:2021cv00127
Defendant:
GARY LAMB, TOWN OF WATERBORO, JONATHAN BROGAN and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN BARTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BARTH v. TOWN OF WATERBORO et al
as 2:2021cv00027
Defendant:
GARY LAMB, TOWN OF WATERBORO and JONATHAN BROGAN
Plaintiff:
JOHN BARTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
HOOD v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2021cv00017
Plaintiff:
GARY A HOOD
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
AUCOIN et al v. FLOWERS FOODS INC et al
as 1:2020cv00411
Defendant:
CK SALES CO LLC, FLOWERS FOODS INC and LEPAGE BAKERIES PARK STREET LLC
Plaintiff:
PETER CARR, GARY WHITE, MICHAEL BARLOW and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
