Cases 1 - 10 of 292
Cunningham et al v. Allegan, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Sherry Cunningham, Gary Day, Josette Day and others
Defendant:
Allegan, County of and Sally L. Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal-Other Civil Rights
Heath v. Anderson et al
as 2:2024cv10682
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Heath
Defendant:
Adrian Anderson, Gary Charles Cole, Jr. and Oscoda County of
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Heath v. Cole et al
as 1:2024cv10568
Plaintiff:
Mark Andrew Heath and Mark Andrew Heath [E-filer]
Defendant:
Gary Charles Cole, Jr., Adrian Anderson and Oscoda, County of
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv13288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Howard v. J. et al
as 4:2023cv12549
Plaintiff:
Gary M. Howard
Defendant:
Seifert J., Jason Singleton, Canton Police Department and others
Strong et al v. Marquette, County of et al
as 2:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Tracy Strong, Tonya Strong, Robert Osborne and others
Defendant:
Marquette, County of, Jacqueline Solomon, Nicholas Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Grossman v. West Bloomfield, Charter Township of
as 4:2023cv11851
Plaintiff:
Gary Grossman
Defendant:
Charter Township of West Bloomfield and West Bloomfield, Charter Township of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
