Cases 41 - 50 of 250
McGhee v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00001
Plaintiff:
Benjamin McGhee
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Kim Tobias Thomas and Rodney Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bass v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2012cv01124
Plaintiff:
Mark Cedric Bass, Sr.
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bales v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv01083
Plaintiff:
David H. Bales
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Kenneth Sconyers and John D. Ivey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flie v. Darbouze et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv01074
Plaintiff:
Maxson Flie
Defendant:
Jean Darbouze and Gary Hetzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bass v. Keeton et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv01043
Plaintiff:
Tommy Bass
Defendant:
Munchie Keeton , Sgt. Danzy , Stacy White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Hetzel, et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2012cv01030
Plaintiff:
David Lamar Johnson
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Luther Strange and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Hetzell et al
as 5:2012cv03908
Petitioner:
Kenneth Wilson
Respondent:
Gary Hetzell and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mallory v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv01011
Plaintiff:
Jacques G. Mallory
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Larry Anglin and Lorenzo Greene
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiggins v. Hetzel
as 1:2012cv00712
Petitioner:
William Christopher Wiggins
Respondent:
Gary Hetzel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv01012
Plaintiff:
Rodney L. Smith
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Larry Anglin, Officer Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
